STOP THE PIPELINES

Hopeful resistance has been abundant throughout the long 7-year public process. Despite the deplorable inactions by state officials, our hope-filled and direct resistance will continue!

Media Highlights Once Construction Began

Oil pipeline foes protest Enbridge’s Line 3 in Minnesota (Associated Press, 6/7/2021)

Line 3 Protest Tests 2 of Biden's Campaign Pledges (New York Times, 6/7/2021)

30 years ago, the Line 3 pipeline burst, gushing 1.7 million gallons of crude near Grand Rapids, MN (anniversary coverage by MPR News, Duluth News Tribune, CBS3 Duluth, Fox 21, and LPTV)

Clash at historic Minnesota pipeline spill leads to charges: Water protectors gathered at the site of a 1991 oil spill that was the largest inland oil spill in the U.S. (Indian Country Today, 3/3/21)

Tribes, faith leaders petition Biden to end Enbridge Line 3 pipeline (EarthBeat, 2/12/21)

Rep. Ilhan Omar calls on Biden to Reject Line 3 Pipeline (press release, 2/3/21); the Congresswoman also hosted a short livestream where the pipeline would cross the Mississippi Headwaters

The Energy 202: The pipeline fights are only beginning for Biden (Washington Post, 1/19/21)

Over 75 Indigenous Women Urge Biden to Stop Climate-Wrecking Pipelines and Respect Treaty Rights. (Common Dreams, 1/14/21); press release by Women’s Earth and Climate Action Network (WECAN)

Resistance to Line 3: Direct Actions Aim to Stop Construction (Unicorn Riot, 1/11/21)

Spiritual and Religious Leaders Protest Line 3 Construction in Palisade (Lakeland News, 12/17/20)

---

Inspirational Stories Throughout the Resistance

The stories below are just some of the ways this movement has brought healing, hope, and community to our region.

The Minnesota State Bar Association explored structural bias and racism within the law in the context of Line 3. Part 1 examines the agency approval process and the role of the public in that process. Part 2 explores the racialized impact of that facially neutral approval in the context of MN's legal history.

Over 370 groups from the United States and around the world, including MNIPL, sent an open letter to President Biden, urging him to stop Line 3 by suspending its improperly issued federal permits. Read the press release and full letter.

On April 1, 2021, Indigenous youth and organizers from the frontlines of the Line 3 & Dakota Access pipeline fights traveled to the White House to demand President Biden #BuildBackFossilFree and stop these climate destroying projects. Watch and share the video about this youth-led action.

Giniw Collective and allies have pushed forward direct action along the pipeline route, at Enbridge offices, and at the biggest banks in the world, pushing to stop the tar sands once and for all.

Youth have taken to the streets and to the banks to Stop Line 3.

Ordinary citizens have been speaking up in public hearings for years, even through a global pandemic. 

The Missing and Murdered Indigenous Peoples movement has brought international attention to the disproportionate violence and injustice perpetrated against Indigenous women, which is linked to large construction activities like Line 3.

A group of 13 young people (under 25) are legally intervening as a party in the case to stop Line 3, representing themselves in a room full of lawyers.

On Sept. 28, 2020, MN350 and 1,200 people from all corners of Minnesota, as well as many neighboring states, came together in Duluth for the Gichi-gami Gathering to Stop Line 3

More than 400 religious and spiritual leaders signed a letter calling on government leaders to rein in law enforcement responses to the inevitable protests against Enbridge Line 3. (August 2020)

Winona LaDuke and Bill McKibben sat down in April 2020 for a discussion about Line 3 in light of the collapse of the oil industry during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A group of Indigenous youth fighting Line 3 went on a 250-mile canoe journey to stand for the water. (July 2018)

At the Public Utilities Commission meeting in June 2018, 550 faith leaders said no to Line 3. They then gathered at the Headwaters of the Mississippi for an interfaith prayer gathering to Protect Sacred Water. In February 2020, many returned to the Minnesota Capitol to pray for that same water in the Governor’s Office. 

 

Organizations to follow in the movement:

• Giniw Collective
• RISE Coalition
• Gitchigumi Scouts
• Honor the Earth
• Red Lake Treaty Camp
• Indigenous Environmental Network
• Camp Migizi
• MN350
• Power Shift Network
• Students Against Pipelines
• Northfield Against Line 3
• Health Professionals for a Healthy Climate
• Science for the People
• Minnesota Environmental Partnership
• Rainforest Action Network
• Sunrise Movement,
• Twin Cities DSA,
• Pipeline Legal Action Network,
• Sierra Club

The Line 3 Expansion is a massive new tar sands oil pipeline being constructed by Enbridge through the heart of Northern Minnesota. If completed, the pipeline would move 760,000 barrels per day of oil (bpd), an amount similar to Keystone XL (830,000 bpd) and the Dakota Access Pipeline (570,000 bpd). Line 3 would cross over a hundred waterways in Minnesota alone, including the headwaters of the Mississippi River. It would also pass extremely close to the border of multiple Native nations and across hundreds of miles of treaty-protected land: land that those communities depend on for drinking water and wild rice gathering.

Enbridge is a Canadian company that owns a large share of the Dakota Access pipeline and is responsible for two of the largest inland oil spills in US history: 1991 in Grand Rapids, MN and 2010 in Kalamazoo, MI. Enbridge refers to this project as the “Line 3 Replacement,” intending for it to replace an existing, aging pipeline also called Line 3. However, this is no mere replacement: the new Line 3 would have more than double the capacity and follow a largely different route.

For more detailed pipeline project information, click here.

Visit Mapping the Black Snake for a visual representation of the pipeline and context on the fight.

Permit Process

In order to build the pipeline, Enbridge needed a number of permits and the approval of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC). In June 2018, the PUC unanimously approved the pipeline project, ignoring the legal arguments concerning treaty rights and climate change, and going against the concerns of 68,000 public comments (fully 94% of the public comments). More than a year after this approval, on November 30, 2020, the State of Minnesota granted the final permits for construction of the Line 3 pipeline. But the fight is far from over.